|
Post by account_disabled on Nov 23, 2023 9:55:30 GMT
The gains were minimal: it was not enough to feed the children and sick brother. At this time, the neighbors were smoking fish. Collectors asked to share. They give him fish, but much less than he asks for. Yes, stealing is wrong. But neither was ignoring the fact that his brother was ill. What decision can he make? Don't steal anything, part or all of the fish. The Moral Compromise System offers all of these options. Judgment depends on incentives. Incentives determine which solutions are available Phone Number List to us and what we can do. Our collectors consider how each stolen fish will speed up the brother's recovery and how much it will hurt his neighbors. For example, he might decide that he can steal all the neighbor's fish if it saves his brother's life. If the younger brother has a cold and just closer to recovery, he's likely to be discouraged from stealing. If the fish significantly helps the brother fight off disease while not doing too much harm to the neighbors, collectors would rather just steal part of the fish. Moral dilemmas activate a system responsible for specific values (honor, justice, mutual aid, etc.). The value, in turn, suggests a solution. Reciprocity is related to cognitive systems of social exchange. Suppose a forager remembers that he was helpful to his neighbor last week, and her response is to be mean.
|
|